View Poll Results: Who should be there first ?

Voters
3. You may not vote on this poll
  • Journalists

    1 33.33%
  • Law enforcing agencies

    2 66.67%
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Jouranlists or Police

  1. #1
    meetdilip
    Guest

    Default Jouranlists or Police

    When something bad happen it is media that spots it first. Local police known to have good contacts in area arrive only after we see live in one of the news channels. Is the people bound to protect us are slower than journalists in collecting information ?

    I would be happy to name it Police or Journalists, but in present scenario, it is impossible as journalists are good at gathering intelligence than law enforcing agencies.

  2. #2
    newprouser
    Guest

    Default

    the former has to earn his daily bread and latter has to just ensure that he gets his bread daily....

    so who d'ya think will be more enthusiastic

    but then again its confusing to say who should arrive first...

    -- Journalists can damage the evidence , in the process of covering the event.

    -- Law enforcement can do the same or hush up the story or divert the case esp. if they are pressurised to do so by politicians . so in the absence of any other proof that the evidence has been tampered by the police, justice can be denied.
    Last edited by newprouser; 05-12-09 at 09:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  3. #3
    Platinum Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Liked
    1 times
    Posts
    3,171

    Default

    Journalists.

    politicians or thieves.


    -F

    ooops wrong thread ;-)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)