India Broadband Forum

08-03-09, 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickey

haaa!!!shhhaaatt

translate please

08-03-09, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickey

haaa!!!shhhaaatt

Mickey in bengali 'aruvval' called 'katari'

08-03-09, 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Endless Sky

Mickey in bengali 'aruvval' called 'katari'

katari is chaku no its not chaku

its the biggest one

08-03-09, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pri_dm

katari is chaku no its not chaku

its the biggest one

Then what can we say ? 'biggest chaku'

no then 'aruvval' is ok

08-03-09, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Endless Sky

Then what can we say ? 'biggest chaku'

no then 'aruvval' is ok

its more like a butchers knife which da gosht(meat) chopping butchers use in delhi. they just hang the whole goat and keep on cutting. and aruvval can cut human too.

Punch Farce · 08-03-09, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickey

arruval moustache??

sorry

1. off topic
2. sorry punch for disfiguring your face ;-)

08-03-09, 06:03 AM

lol too good reppable :-P

08-03-09, 06:04 AM

08-03-09, 11:40 AM

If severe punishment can stop crime ancient systems would have no crime rate at all. It is wrong to think like that. Severe varies from person to person and for those criminals at least we should bore their eyes to call it punishment. It is not the punishment but law enforcement that should be severe. We do not see an increase in crime rate after the death penalty was reduced to rare cases. Those do those crimes will do it even if the punishment is severe or not. They have methods to evade the system. If we make punishments harder innocent people will be falling prey to such things.

I am not arguing for no punishments, but for a better system and law enforcement.

aashaka_gandhi · 08-03-09, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pri_dm

punch u need not punish anyone ur aruvval moustache is enough to make some one pee on his pants.

LMAO.....crazy....

Luke Skywalker · 08-03-09, 03:30 PM

The act of policing is, in order to punish less often, to punish more severely.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Debate: Normal fuel vs. Premium Fuel	just4kix	Cars in India	40	09-24-09 01:26 PM
Pj thread...	smoothvibes	Jokes and humor	52	09-08-09 10:38 PM
The TV debate - LCD vs Plasma vs Traditional CRT	just4kix	Home Appliances and Gadgets	27	08-20-09 03:12 PM
Debate: Is Nitrogen really useful for tyres?	just4kix	Cars in India	22	07-07-09 05:50 PM

India Broadband Forum

Debate Thread

Debate Thread

Similar Threads

08-03-09, 06:03 AM	#107
Pri_dm Guest Posts: n/a	lol too good reppable :-P

08-03-09, 11:40 AM	#109
meetdilip Guest Posts: n/a	If severe punishment can stop crime ancient systems would have no crime rate at all. It is wrong to think like that. Severe varies from person to person and for those criminals at least we should bore their eyes to call it punishment. It is not the punishment but law enforcement that should be severe. We do not see an increase in crime rate after the death penalty was reduced to rare cases. Those do those crimes will do it even if the punishment is severe or not. They have methods to evade the system. If we make punishments harder innocent people will be falling prey to such things. I am not arguing for no punishments, but for a better system and law enforcement.

08-03-09, 03:30 PM	#111
Luke Skywalker Jedi knight Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: IBF Age: 21 Posts: 1,816 Rep Power: 5	The act of policing is, in order to punish less often, to punish more severely.