Yeah ....its not as good as Casino Royale ........ Cheesy dialogues from that old lady nearly killed the movie for me...
Yeah ....its not as good as Casino Royale ........ Cheesy dialogues from that old lady nearly killed the movie for me...
exactly, action sequences were not that good either.
Ok, I just remembered something from the film........
the plane fighting sequence, let me see who else can explain what Bond exactly did to destroy the rogue fighter plane........come on guys ,think,think
REPO FOR CORRECT ANSWER.
HINT: remember car racing games.
anyone......................
Last edited by Evander Leopold; 11-15-08 at 11:04 PM.
quantum of solace is utter crap movie... just wasted money... expecting to be awesome.. went to red carpet.. theatre.. huh... utter non sense.. slept for more thn half a movie...
Yeah i agree ......
Too much Gloss and hollow inside ..........
Nowadays those directors care only for the money ....... James Bond Movies have been steadily deteriorating in terms of quality
hey, wait a minute............
"Casino Royale" was probably the second-best bond film ever made. All thanks go to the director and actors who made the most-boring bond story into an amazimg movie.
ofcourse "Quantum..." was a bad film.
But I believe it served a purpose, it concluded the previous story, elaborated on Bond's new avtar and.......
Then again, I m appreciating this apparently hidden facts only because I m the biggest bond fan. So I guess to others this one is just a horrible movie.
and I can understand that.
correct ..... i look for a good storyline in a movie .......
Like i have said a 1000 times before if the story isnt believable or realistic IMO no actor/stunt can make it interesting for me [unless its an animation movie that is] .....
I am really impartial towards actors,directors or the name of the film ....
I dont understand shadow........
so what do u think, was filming "quantum" justified or not ????????
the film didnt really have any plot. it seemed to me that the only reason behind makin the movie was they were forced to make a bond movie tht left them wid no time to think of a story. hmm. disappoinment.
avtion scene i dint find anything special.. i just dont have words to explain... crap crap crap... forget it!
Yes. A very weak plot. It appears more like typical Bollywood flick where they develop the plot as the shooting progresses.
There was a lot of (impressive) action but all that was not necessary.
you guys are right .. it was pointless movie.
Daniel Craig was not guuud on the bonds character......sean connery and pierce brosnan are the best
I've never liked Bond Movies.
Adventure movies don't attract me...they seem too unrealistic.
On the same lines, Indiana Jones 4 was a disaster.
crap movie.
dint understand wat was happenin watsoever.
partly cause i dint watch the earlier one
...i mean how was i to know this was a continuation![]()
Well look whose back ....
IBF has changed a lot .... check it out![]()
As far as I could understand Bond raced his plane's engine further to increase the smoke coming out of the already burning engine so as to obscure the vision of the pursuing rogue fighter. Then Bond intentionally brought his plane near the hillside whereupon the pursuing fighter not being able to see what was ahead (coz of the smoke) crashed.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
And I think this is the first Bond movie where Bond does not end up in bed with the leading lady (Camille)![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)