This is a discussion on Proof of travel not required for claiming LTA: Supreme Court within the News and Views from the Business World forums, part of the News and views category; Proof of travel not required for claiming LTA: Supreme Court Employers, while assessing the conveyance and leave & travel allowance ...
| |||||||
| News and Views from the Business World Find breaking news, multimedia, reviews & opinion on business, sports, movies, travel, books, jobs, education, real estate, cars & more. |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Aadhavan is Coming Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Leaving Chennai Age: 26
Posts: 3,075
Rep Power: 10 | Proof of travel not required for claiming LTA: Supreme Court Employers, while assessing the conveyance and leave & travel allowance (LTA) claims of their staff, are under no statutory obligation to collect supporting evidence and furnish them to tax authorities, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday. A bench comprising Justice SH Kapadia and Justice Aftab Alam said that assessee employers are under no statutory obligation to collect bills and details to prove that the employees had utilised the amounts obtained against these claims on travel and related expenses. According to prevailing rules, if claims on LTA and conveyance are not supported by journey bills, they would be taxed. For instance, on an LTA allowance of Rs 1 lakh, if documentary proof such as air tickets, taxi vouchers and other public transport bills are submitted only for Rs 50,000, then tax is applicable on the rest of the amount. Regardless of the amount an executive is entitled to as LTA, tax laws allow air tickets only in the domestic sector for the claim. The apex court order came in a plea by companies including Larsen &Toubro and ITI. In its defence, the revenue department had argued that assessee companies were under statutory obligation under Income Tax Act, 1961, and relevant rules, to collect documentary proof to show that their employee(s) had actually utilised the amount paid towards the leave travel concession and conveyance allowance. Rejecting the plea, the court in its order said: “The beneficiary of exemption under Section 10(5) (of the Income Tax Act) is an individual employee. There is no circular of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) requiring the employer under Section 192 to collect and examine the supporting evidence to the declaration to be submitted by an employee(s).” |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Platinum Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: New Delhi
Posts: 2,215
Rep Power: 9 | That woulde come as a great boon to many pvt. sector employees. As far as Govt/PSU employees are concerned, they get the benefit only on production of proof of travel. So not impact. Also can you pl. provide the case reference. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Age: 26
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 | This only shifts the onus from the employer to the employee....the employee can be called upon to submit proof of LTA by the IT department after filing the return. |
| | |
| Tags |
| claiming, lta, proof, required, travel |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Consumer court | sujithsukrutham | General offtopic discussions | 6 | 10-21-09 08:15 PM |
| Be Aware...Supreme Court Judgement | Dragon | General offtopic discussions | 1 | 11-04-08 01:47 PM |
| BSNL Connection and Proof Documents Problem | saesms | BSNL broadband | 16 | 07-10-08 11:32 AM |