OS tested-->
- Fedora 11 KDE-LIVE
- Fedora 11-DVD-X86-64 installer
Hardware used-->
PC
- Processor: AMD 64 Atlon-2800+
- RAM: 2.5GB DDR400
- Graphics: nvidia 7600GS-512MB
- TV tuner: Pinnacle media center
- HDD: HITYACHI and Seagate-SATA and Samsung-IDE
- ODD: HITACHI DVD/RW-SONY DVD/CD
- UPS: APC Back UPS-ES 500
- MODEM: C2110 SIEMENS (ISP-BSNL)
LAPTOP
- Processor: Intel Dual Core 2GHz
- RAM: 2GB DDR2
- Graphics: onboard-intel-64MB
- HDD: SATA
- ODD: DVD/RW
- MODEM: C2110
---------------------------------------
Fedora release 11, though late but came out a few very good changes. I was about to post review for Fedora 11 kde LIVE, but then I thought of downloading the DVD also and tried it and found out some big differences.
---------------------------------------
Advantages common to both distros:
- Both the GUIs are almost 99% same
- Both share the same network functionalities and flexibility as usual
- Unmounted file systems can be mounted right from the explorer window with full RW access (for NTFS partitions also) with only the root password which lasts for one session.
- Both support virtualization
- Easily configurable system
- Boot time is comparatively low
- As usual this Fedora system is also a heaven for developers
- My modem was configured in 4 clicks
- TV worked better than windows as usual
Flaws common to both distros:
- Although the desktop effects worked good on the laptop without(or with limited graphics functionality) graphics card, the effects were terrible on my desktop with a fairly good graphics card
- It is known that Fedora does not support multimedia types like AVI, mp3 etc, and it’s no different this time. You have to install codecs manually.
---------------------------------------
Fedora 11 LIVE KDE:
Advantages:
- Although on a CD, it comes with full set of tools anybody would ever need
- Gives you freedom of creating a LIVE USB OS out of the LIVE CD
- Comes with more number of desktop themes than the DVD distro
- Files system are mounted with full RWX access by default
- Works better than the DVD OS , the difference can be felt during normal web browsing, file access, and also the LIVE OS comes with more GUI customizable options .
Flaws:
- The LIVE OS gives you the ease of installing the OS permanently right from your live desktop, but it fails at around half way of installation when done from a USB booted LIVE OS. except one->discussed in flaws section below), There is another major drawback in installation of Fedora LIVE—while doing manual partitioning, the installer would not continue until you create an ext4 partition for root and an ext3 partition for /boot, you must provide two partitions.
- Sometimes while configuring the modem the x server crashes and screen just goes blank , the session ends without a clue and goes to the logon screen or to the console window(this is less frequent in DVD installed OS)
---------------------------------------
Fedora 11 DVD=X86-64( installed system ):
Advantages:
- The installation and partitioning worked very well without any problem (, although I prefer manual partitioning, I just selected “Replace the old LINUX installation” and everything was done automatically with an option of reviewing the partition table after auto allocation of file systems.
- This time Fedora uses ext4 file system for OS installation
- The OS updates itself automatically without any interference.
Flaws:
- The desktop comes with only one theme, fewer number of splash screens while the LIVE version comes with loads of them (strange). While trying to get new themes also the search tool never connects or draws anything from internet for updating.
- The desktop is set to a lower level of resolution sometimes than the maximum supported(on my desktop), even if you change the resolution, it will revert back to the original resolution after reboot.(only happened for my desktop- not the laptop)
- I was not able to set the date and time to my system time after a no of tries , the time zones do not show any Indian place (this was a very short observation- you may find one for India-tell me), and I could not set the OS time to my system time either.
- Although the automatic update works flawless but I like the manual update and thats what did not work here. Once you try to update manually, a search begins and never ends. i don't know whether the search is for finding the installed packages or for any task to respond or something else.(I need help here.)
- The automatic update settings should be set manually to notify or the OS will download and install updates without your knowledge, which may cost users like me who use limited download connections like HOME 500.(This is not a flaw, this is just an observation)
The never ending search while trying manual install or update.
Attachment 4057
Attachment 4059
The poor scratchy desktop effects.
Attachment 4058
I don't think I have left anything major, but any help in finding them will be appreciated.
---------------------------------------
Bottom line:
Fedora 3 was my first LINUX.
I was using Mandriva before Fedara-11, and I am going right back to Mandriva.
Lets see what comes next.
---------------------------------------
This review was solely system specific and your opinion may vary,
waiting for comments.
---------------------------------------
Next review- elive