Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34

Thread: Download and Upload increased and ping time lowerd!!

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default Download and Upload increased and ping time lowerd!!

    A new Cisco Me-3400 costing rs 1,12,000 was installed by Reliance in our area backed by Fiber optic Metro Ethernet network and capable of carrying 160MbPS core speed from BTS


    cisco me 3400
    CISCO ME 3400.png

    Effect on connectivity
    sasc.PNG
    Line speed is now always 12MbPS+Down and 26MbPS+Up!!! 24X7

    Effect on plans

    bandwidth on YouTube is improved getting 570kbps in 500kbps plan!!!
    Attachment 5762

    ping time lowered
    xa.PNG
    earlier it was 230ms.

  2. #2
    Admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Liked
    6 times
    Posts
    5,879

    Default

    Now thats some improvement... I get an average of 319 to that ip using my tata connection.. Do you have a fiber optic cable connection?

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Admin View Post
    Now thats some improvement... I get an average of 319 to that ip using my tata connection.. Do you have a fiber optic cable connection?

    Fibre optic is coming from reliance BTS and that fiber is connected to Cisco Me3400 from that Cisco cat5 cable is taken to our home so barely 100-200 mtr Cat5 wire is used and rest is backed by Fiber optics and High frequency Radio Link!! this is the reason behind awesome latency and speed all day long!!

    here it follows

    Radio link----------------Fiber optic--------------High quality 4pair cat 5 cable
    Reliance BTS>>>>>>>>>Cisco me3400>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>our Pc.
    Last edited by Rcom; 08-25-09 at 07:02 PM.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Only Verizon Wireless in USA and South Korean Isp's gives Fiber to Home connectivity, and only Reliance In India gives Fiber To Node from that Node Cat5 wire is taken, Bell and Roger's telecommunication in Canada uses same technology as Reliance but they employ DSL from their Nodes.


    Verizon FiOS Fiber Optic Node

    mini-co.jpg
    Last edited by Rcom; 08-26-09 at 12:29 AM.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    27

    Default

    nice information:thumbup1:

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Pic on Reliance Wired connectivity.

    Attachment 5772

  7. #7
    Admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Liked
    6 times
    Posts
    5,879

    Default

    Well thats probably the reason why you get such low pings.. A must have for online gaming

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Admin View Post
    Well thats probably the reason why you get such low pings.. A must have for online gaming
    but major hand behind low ping and high speeds is FLAG internet backbone which is owned by Reliance!! that cable carry 10GBPS+ bandwidth!!!!

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Flag cable reach

    CableFlagEuroAsia.jpg

  10. #10
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    193

    Default

    rcom u rocked man keep it up....................
    U will have a gr8 response from us......................
    Thanx ....

  11. #11
    MODDY mickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Liked
    12 times
    Posts
    6,931

    Default

    great info Rcom... really great and impressive stuff..

  12. #12
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Sorry to dispel a myth ( one of greatest of our time),copper wires have better latency( then optic fibres) & will always have . Ask any communication engineer with knowledge.
    It is the fault of various DSL type service providers in India that they are not able to do so.

    Isn't 10GBPS too small a bandwidth?
    Latency is not all.
    Last edited by Luke Skywalker; 09-04-09 at 08:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
    History is on the move,my friends.Those who cannot keep up will be left behind, to watch from distance.And those who stand in its way will not watch at all.http://windows7sins.org/
    People are going to tell stories about me none of which change who I really am.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker View Post
    Sorry to dispel a myth ( one of greatest of our time),copper wires have better latency( then optic fibres) & will always have . Ask any communication engineer with knowledge.
    It is the fault of various DSL type service providers in India that they are not able to do so.

    Isn't 10GBPS too small a bandwidth?
    Latency is not all.

    if copper wire is good then why communication giants like Reliance is laying Fiber-optics cables under sea???

  14. #14
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Optic is not better due to latency but bandwidth.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rcom View Post
    if copper wire is good then why communication giants like Reliance is laying Fiber-optics cables under sea???
    Because of bandwidth.

    A copper wire can't offer bandwidth more than 55mbps(theoritically practically only 55mBps) & optic wires offer bandwidth upto many tbps.
    Last edited by Luke Skywalker; 09-04-09 at 08:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker View Post
    Optic is not better due to latency but bandwidth.



    Because of bandwidth.

    A copper wire can't offer bandwidth more than 55mbps(theoritically practically only 55mBps) & optic wires offer bandwidth upto many tbps.
    if ur copper network have better latency then why don't u ping 62.189.6.22 and post the result here

  16. #16
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Also if your distance is more dataloss is more in copper. Thats why people living near hub get better speed than those further.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rcom View Post
    if ur copper network have better latency then why don't u ping 62.189.6.22 and post the result here
    Check out in any book & see what they say.
    Last edited by Luke Skywalker; 09-04-09 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker View Post
    Also if your distance is more dataloss is more in copper. Thats why people living near hub get better speed than those further.



    Check out in any book & see what they say.


    if ur copper network have better latency then why don't u ping 62.189.6.22 and post the result here

  18. #18
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default



    I don't like wasting time.

    If you don't believe here is full screen shot:

    I think I should post this in believe it or not.

    Seeing how popular this myth is.
    Last edited by Luke Skywalker; 09-04-09 at 08:57 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    ok live in misconception that "Copper" transmission is better than optics

  20. #20
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rcom View Post
    ok live in misconception that "Copper" transmission is better than optics
    That I have never said. Read what I said that latency is much better in copper wires not bandwidth ( how much you can download) & attenuation ( noise in signal).

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    ur ping time is higher than mine

  22. #22
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    No it is not. Also I live far from my exchange..
    My ping is with 56 byte of data & yours is with 32 byte . Do the math & tell me which is faster.

    Optic is better not due to latency but due to very high bandwidth & very low attenuation.
    Last edited by Luke Skywalker; 09-04-09 at 09:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker View Post
    Yes , it is & not that significant factor seeing that I live farther than my telephone exhange.
    Also my plan is nearly 1/6th yours price.
    don't give silly excuses like i live far from exchange my plan cost this that etc main thing is who get the best ping time.


    bottom line is copper don't come in league of Fiber-Optics.

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    408

    Default

    now with 1024 bytes

    untitled.PNG

  25. #25
    Jedi knight Luke Skywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    23
    Liked
    0 times
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker View Post
    No it is not. Also I live far from my exchange..
    My ping is with 56 byte of data & yours is with 32 byte . Do the math & tell me which is faster.

    Optic is better not due to latency but due to very high bandwidth & very low attenuation.
    I have reposted the answer & edited it after reading your ping. Mine is infact 2/3rd yours taking into consideration the amount of data transfer. Yours is just 32 bytes & mine is 56 bytes.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •