Thread: Download and Upload increased and ping time lowerd!!

A new Cisco Me-3400 costing rs 1,12,000 was installed by Reliance in our area backed by Fiber optic Metro Ethernet network and capable of carrying 160MbPS core speed from BTS


cisco me 3400
CISCO ME 3400.png

Effect on connectivity
sasc.PNG
Line speed is now always 12MbPS+Down and 26MbPS+Up!!! 24X7

Effect on plans

bandwidth on YouTube is improved getting 570kbps in 500kbps plan!!!
Attachment 5762

ping time lowered
xa.PNG
earlier it was 230ms.

Now thats some improvement... I get an average of 319 to that ip using my tata connection.. Do you have a fiber optic cable connection?

Originally Posted by Admin

Now thats some improvement... I get an average of 319 to that ip using my tata connection.. Do you have a fiber optic cable connection?

Fibre optic is coming from reliance BTS and that fiber is connected to Cisco Me3400 from that Cisco cat5 cable is taken to our home so barely 100-200 mtr Cat5 wire is used and rest is backed by Fiber optics and High frequency Radio Link!! this is the reason behind awesome latency and speed all day long!!

here it follows

Radio link----------------Fiber optic--------------High quality 4pair cat 5 cable
Reliance BTS>>>>>>>>>Cisco me3400>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>our Pc.

Only Verizon Wireless in USA and South Korean Isp's gives Fiber to Home connectivity, and only Reliance In India gives Fiber To Node from that Node Cat5 wire is taken, Bell and Roger's telecommunication in Canada uses same technology as Reliance but they employ DSL from their Nodes.


Verizon FiOS Fiber Optic Node

mini-co.jpg

nice information:thumbup1:

Pic on Reliance Wired connectivity.

Attachment 5772

Well thats probably the reason why you get such low pings.. A must have for online gaming

Originally Posted by Admin

Well thats probably the reason why you get such low pings.. A must have for online gaming

but major hand behind low ping and high speeds is FLAG internet backbone which is owned by Reliance!! that cable carry 10GBPS+ bandwidth!!!!

Flag cable reach

CableFlagEuroAsia.jpg

rcom u rocked man keep it up....................
U will have a gr8 response from us......................
Thanx ....

great info Rcom... really great and impressive stuff..

Sorry to dispel a myth ( one of greatest of our time),copper wires have better latency( then optic fibres) & will always have . Ask any communication engineer with knowledge.
It is the fault of various DSL type service providers in India that they are not able to do so.

Isn't 10GBPS too small a bandwidth?
Latency is not all.

Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker

Sorry to dispel a myth ( one of greatest of our time),copper wires have better latency( then optic fibres) & will always have . Ask any communication engineer with knowledge.
It is the fault of various DSL type service providers in India that they are not able to do so.

Isn't 10GBPS too small a bandwidth?
Latency is not all.

if copper wire is good then why communication giants like Reliance is laying Fiber-optics cables under sea???

Optic is not better due to latency but bandwidth.

Originally Posted by Rcom

if copper wire is good then why communication giants like Reliance is laying Fiber-optics cables under sea???

Because of bandwidth.

A copper wire can't offer bandwidth more than 55mbps(theoritically practically only 55mBps) & optic wires offer bandwidth upto many tbps.

Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker

Optic is not better due to latency but bandwidth.



Because of bandwidth.

A copper wire can't offer bandwidth more than 55mbps(theoritically practically only 55mBps) & optic wires offer bandwidth upto many tbps.

if ur copper network have better latency then why don't u ping 62.189.6.22 and post the result here

Also if your distance is more dataloss is more in copper. Thats why people living near hub get better speed than those further.

Originally Posted by Rcom

if ur copper network have better latency then why don't u ping 62.189.6.22 and post the result here

Check out in any book & see what they say.

Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker

Also if your distance is more dataloss is more in copper. Thats why people living near hub get better speed than those further.



Check out in any book & see what they say.

if ur copper network have better latency then why don't u ping 62.189.6.22 and post the result here

I don't like wasting time.

If you don't believe here is full screen shot:

I think I should post this in believe it or not.

Seeing how popular this myth is.

ok live in misconception that "Copper" transmission is better than optics

Originally Posted by Rcom

ok live in misconception that "Copper" transmission is better than optics

That I have never said. Read what I said that latency is much better in copper wires not bandwidth ( how much you can download) & attenuation ( noise in signal).

ur ping time is higher than mine

No it is not. Also I live far from my exchange..
My ping is with 56 byte of data & yours is with 32 byte . Do the math & tell me which is faster.

Optic is better not due to latency but due to very high bandwidth & very low attenuation.

Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker

Yes , it is & not that significant factor seeing that I live farther than my telephone exhange.
Also my plan is nearly 1/6th yours price.

don't give silly excuses like i live far from exchange my plan cost this that etc main thing is who get the best ping time.


bottom line is copper don't come in league of Fiber-Optics.

now with 1024 bytes

untitled.PNG

Originally Posted by Luke Skywalker

No it is not. Also I live far from my exchange..
My ping is with 56 byte of data & yours is with 32 byte . Do the math & tell me which is faster.

Optic is better not due to latency but due to very high bandwidth & very low attenuation.

I have reposted the answer & edited it after reading your ping. Mine is infact 2/3rd yours taking into consideration the amount of data transfer. Yours is just 32 bytes & mine is 56 bytes.