nice review Dhanesh![]()
nice review Dhanesh![]()
agreed for J4K![]()
Plz review my previous post in this thread in which i mentioned about the problems faced during the first trial of highest poster contest.
I didnt get this point.I would like to keep the contest for new posts only.
Who will select the panel of judges? Isnt it almost same like judging the entires? will the selection be based on number of votes/reps etc etc. all these ways of selection are not appropriate according to me. as i mentioned in my previous post - the exchange of reps/votes/replies comes in the scenario here also. and this will be advantageous for some particular members.We should select a panel of fifteen to vote on the contest entry. These will be the judges. Judges will have to take the pledge to vote on every contest entry. I am willing to do the tallying up of marks at the end of the contest.
will these be possible to implement manually? as the contest grows keeping track of all these aspects/calculations will become very difficult unless there is an automated system.Besides the judges, others could vote on the thread. Judges marks will count 75% and others' marks 25%.
Contest entries to have minimum 100 words not counting common words like articles, prepositions, suppositions, etc.
Excerpts of text copied from elsewhere (even if retyped) not allowed.
No topics related to jokes, movie reviews, etc. We can expand the list with mutual consent.
Nice Ideas.Heavy prize money to encourage participation. Top prize of Rs. 10K (?) with blessings from admin.[*]No limit on entries per person.[*]Judges may also participate but cannot vote on their own entry.
Yes - Partiality... this is the main concern which i am trying to express again and again.Admin and Mods can revoke points or disqualify entry if it is felt that there is partiality.
All the sections (technical and non-technical sections) had more activity before the start of the highest poster contest. The poster contest had pissed off a number of members while most of the new members left after getting the prize money.
You are saying that activity increased during that time, because you had started browsing the forums just before the start of the contest. And, I hope that the old members would make sure whether I was right.
All the forums and members were also having some really good terms with each other. It was true that the activity did increase for some 4-6 days, But, it activity had actually gone down after those starting days.
A humble request.
Please do not put a cap on no of words. It will be nice if we have an approval system if the no of words is higher than cap (if cap cannot be avoided).
For some topics, we need to be extravagant in use of words to explain properly and in a simple manner.
:w00t::001_tt2: i know u were not talking about me. even i was talking about other winners. it is quite obvious that the participation after the contest has reduced from some members but no one among the winners actually left after getting the money. at least i think so.![]()
Many comments ... I will explain my thoughts one by one ...
You are absolutely right. Some users who were active then have become dormant now. And a few who were active before the contest became quiet during the contest and since then gone underground. I will not take names. Suffice to say that we never intended all that.
Panel members can be anyone. Before the contest we can invite people. Admin/Mods will be automatic choice and the others can be selected on "first come first served" basis. But the judges will have to go thru the terms and conditions and pledge to uphold the rules. It will be like typical jury selection in USA - 12 angry men and all that. That was exactly my idea - Admin + 2 mods + 12 members of the jury.
The reason I said 100 words is because many of the people find difficult to muster even those many words. Our previous writing contests were a challenge to many, not excluding yours truly.
Next batch of comments ...
That will what the member panel will do. Last time, it became a herculean task to hunt for plagarized text. And that led to some not so pleasant arguments. But hopefully, this time, it may not be the case.
Thanks.
My bad. New threads and not new posts.
As said earlier, we will post a request ... "Invitation for judging the contest". The post will include terms and conditions and undertakings. Some T&C could be:
1. The past record
2. Minimum 300 posts
3. Minimum membership time of 3 months
4. Judges must read and vote on all contest entries, etc.
We could devise a method. We can put a poll on each contest entry for easy voting.
OK. Let bygones be bygones.
What I meant was that thread for contest could be on any topic but posted in a single forum section only.
Last edited by just4kix; 04-17-09 at 12:06 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
*** Never argue with an idiot. ***
All my useful articles and Guides | My Movie Collection | My Blogs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the reply.
I am very eager to one of the panel members....Kindly accept my humble request...![]()
good clarifications given by J4K. I agree and dont have any doubts...![]()
I support Rameshjee to be on the panel of judges for this contest!![]()
its my idea![]()
final decision is in hand with admin and just4kix![]()
Tshirt wala idea mera tha
dhanesh nae usko contest mae include kiya
if this idea gets approved by admin and just4kix then it remains the prize winning idea of little dhanesh only
but tshirt print karnae ka to mainae bola tha na :sad:
OH, I was just talking abou the contest,
T-shirt idea is ofcourse yours.
Sab aapki kirpa hai maalik
An idea is an idea ... whats the big deal in whose idea is it .. :lol: ...
This thread is going mad ... :lol:
Anyways, lets wait for j4k's word here...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)