Thread: A question to j4k smoothov and others

this is about pixing...

someone sends me this pic and tells me that this is a real nature pic taken by some of her uncle, who is a professional..

i feel like the pic is too good to be taken by a real cam, though need your expertise about it..

pls tell me if this is a real pic, or a photoshop creation...

IMO its edited
check reflection in water
lower clouds and sun rays

Originally Posted by smoothvibes

IMO its edited
check reflection in water
lower clouds and sun rays

yes i was also the same thought... now lets see what j4k wanna say on this and i pack up and give the link to the very cute looking though crude girl..

Yup, it's definitely a photoshop product. Reflection of trees are too good to be true.

^^and the water so shy soft untouched...

she says her uncle took this pic of sea of Finland..or something like that...

yeah its sea of finland just checked on email..

Shes pulling your leg micky! I doubt it very much if someone took that picture, its been edited for sure!

Originally Posted by Preeti_20

Shes pulling your leg micky! I doubt it very much if someone took that picture, its been edited for sure!

either she is pulling my legs, or her uncle is pulling her toes and hanged her upside down,.,,

I don't see why those photos cannot be taken. There might be slight
photoshop adjusting after the pic was taken, but I don't see anything
that jumps out as totally ps created.

It's just long exposure on a tripod that gives the effect.

-F

and what about the first one??/ it exposes lots of editing isnt it??

The first one: maybe those three clouds in the middle have been added,
the left edges align in a weird way, other than that it is just adjustments
and corrections I think.

-F

yeah you featured it out... those three look like Broken england..

Such type of photos can be taken using the right wide angle lenses and the graduated denisty filters that I was talking about. Photoshop may have been used to adjust the hues and contrast, etc.

Whether these photos were taken by your friend or her uncle, that is another 'Q'. But she claims that her uncle is a professional then I have reason to believe.

Check the website Photography community, including forums, reviews, and galleries from Photo.net and you will see some really astounding pics.

i am a member of this website,, and i really feel sad, why people are lying that they got with a filter...

such big pics may not be taken up without editing, and at this level... the photo is quite attractive(1st) but the photographer's " i did it myself" comment broke him from the league...


thats why i object from using editors much more like others do,, and so my pics are quite rubbish for many dudes.. basically cause they are blown off..

for ex. take a look on this..

one may say its a photoshop.. but its my own camera shot(without editing. just compressed and smallerised for this website)

you may see many flaws, because i didnt edit it at all..

i dont touch with raws basically(unless they are very poor)

From Corbett National Park


I tagged it: The foreigner ..

All these pics are very nice but look edited ... though i m not very good at determining if ps is used

@Ruchi( dont feel offended for this)

All these pics are very nice but look edited

There are just three pics... and one is mine, so you included it too

mickey, don't be sad, i m sorry if i hurt ... i told that i m not very good at determining ... its just my thought ... but trust me ur pic is very nice

Originally Posted by Ruchika Akhtar

mickey, don't be sad, i m sorry if i hurt ... i told that i m not very good at determining ... its just my thought ... but trust me ur pic is very nice

oye so you included it too...


p.s: btw an artist is always open to critiques..

i am not an artist...

Originally Posted by just4kix

Check the website Photography community, including forums, reviews, and galleries from Photo.net and you will see some really astounding pics.

One of my favourites for the past 20 years, started visiting photo.net
when Phillip Greenspun created it in the nineties ;-)

-F

Originally Posted by mickey

just compressed and smallerised for this website)

Thanks for improving my vocabulary

i was going to use smallified.

"resized for the web" will be ok.

Originally Posted by Punch Farce

One of my favourites for the past 20 years, started visiting photo.net
when Phillip Greenspun created it in the nineties ;-)

-F



Thanks for improving my vocabulary

One more thing that we have in common. :w00t:

i joined photo.net just a few months ago... that too in search for lens knowledge..

they are the high worlds, just liek you guys are.. so i just surf around there... not more than that...