India Broadband

ShAdOwCoN

Some people do not like First Person Shooters that much [like me] , and some do not like strategy[like Archer] .... so it would be unfair to compare games from 2 diff genre ..... POP is a 3rd person Fantasy while Halo is a first person shooter ....

@thats me

Yeah Prince of persia WW did not have as many combo moves as the others as well as the music was nt that good , and the story was nt followed properly ......so most people say its not as good as TT or SOT

__________________
"Vae Victis" -> "Woe To The Conquered!" - Brennus ( Gaulish Warlord )

Archer

Also POP WW had lot of boring steps to complete and the action was less. In POP TT, the action was even less. But Wasn't boring. POP SOT was the best games of all.

@ thats_me

You are right. As for me, I find little fun in going out there shooting without any kind strategies or plans. Halo was a little boring for me. Like I said before the game didn't had any help for players. So I didn't even think of playing one more Halo game. And now I realize Halo 2 is for vista only. POP series wasn't all about destroying enemies know. But the game lost it's sync after SOT. But still POP TT was good and well made.

__________________

Evander Leopold

dont waste ur time with halo2.
microsoft never remade the game for pc. they just converted the very old playstation version into pc version. and they also put OS restriction in it (vista only). though third party patches r there to play it on XP.
As a game, its disgusting.

__________________
-=-

thats_me

Well I like FPS games very much. And I like strategy too and also games like Splinter Cell. I dont play sports or racing games however.(exept FIFA)

Yea the game was a conversion from xbox 360 tp PC. Ended up having " not so good" graphics in PC version. It had negative feaures of Vista Only. And that 3rd party you are talking about are pirates who made it possible to play the game on XP.

But I enjoyed the game though not as much as I enjoyed some other FPS. Its fairly a good game.